Re: [Richard Stallman <rms@santafe.edu>] Dynamic linking and the GNU GPL

He has always distinguished sharply between linked code (which the GPL covers) and evaluated/compiled code (which the GPL does not cover). If you want to know whether he is right, ask a lawyer. If he is wrong, there is no longer any substantial difference between the GPL and the LGPL. ------------------------------------------------------------ I suggest you (when dynamic linking becomes supported) add text to the effect of: RMS writes on the subject of dynamic libraries: <they are covered by the GPL> If you disagree, contact rms(a)gnu.org or a lawyer, not us.