Re: Deleted packages?
> mailcryptng
> Without mailcryptng, we are back to an outdated version of
mailcrypt.
> I agree mailcryptng should be dropped but only after mailcrypt is
> updated to 3.5.1, the currently released version.
SL> This package hasn't been formally added.
Are you referring to mailcryptng or mailcrypt? If mailcryptng, I agree, it
shouldn't be in there. Instead, mailcrypt should be updated to the latest
version, available from:
http://www.pobox.com/~lbudney/linux/software/mailcrypt.html
I've also sent a patch to xemacs-patches against the latest version to fix
a problem. This patch should be included in the new package.