Re: Why I attempted to port dired/VC from emacs
Mats Lidell wrote:
Anyway. There seems to be a few more things to fix but it does work
better as it is now. Don't you think the Emacs behavior is like it
really should be? So that you can have both a versioned dired listing
and a normal dired listing for the same directory at the same time but
in different buffers?
Yours
I suppose the Emacs way is best. But, it is very difficult to see
where these differences are coming from. I really don't understand
the dired/vc code per se. I just try to fix the obvious bugs and see
what happens. Having said that, I'm pretty happy that it actually
works now. I had just about given up hope.
--
Rodney Sparapani Center for Patient Care & Outcomes Research (PCOR)
Sr. Biostatistician http://www.mcw.edu/pcor
4 wheels good, 2 wheels better! Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW)
WWLD?: What Would Lombardi Do? Milwaukee, WI, USA
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta