2007/2/24, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org>:
Jason Spiro writes:
> The files are OpenDocument Presentation files and equivalent PDFs.
> So, it is unlikely you'll want to copy content between the
> presentation and the rest of xemacs.
I think you underestimate the power of XEmacs. OpenDocument files are
xml, no? So it would not be hard to extract relevant parts from those
files and put them into manuals or docstrings, or vice versa.
Vice versa is actually more likely, since we would presumably wish to
include XEmacs-specific changes. But it is problematic because we
don't have the option of multiple licensing ourselves; the FSF has
been unhelpful, and in any case with very diffuse ownership getting
the necessary permissions to relicense is generally a very uncertain
process.
For this reason, we may want to distribute them separately simply to
make the point that the license is incompatible. This doesn't prevent
the package from hooking in to the menus and so on, it just means that
a certain subset of users (namely, those who don't use the full set of
packages for some reason) would have to go to extra effort to get the
fancy tutorial.
OK, I will try to contact the tutorial's author. Btw, do you want the
tri-license you described, or is public domain OK?
By the way, please note: Have a look at the tutorial. It is good
*because* it is so graphical. A text-only version would be far less
useful.
--
Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile.
I also provide training and spyware removal services for homes and businesses.
Call or email for a FREE 5-minute consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed.
+1 (416) 781-5938 / Email: info(a)jspiro.com / MSN: jasonspiro(a)hotmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta