ht(a)inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
But of course then I'm stuck with other code that won't run because of
the two-different-bases problem.
Anyway, thanks _very_ much for your help, it sounds like the xemacs
folks are really where this needs to be solved. Point is, this is a
regression -- xemacs-21.4.15 works OK (mind you, I haven't tried
recompiling it with gcc-3.3.3).
Henry,
AFAIK, we didn't make any changes in 21.4.16 that would account for
this. As an experiment, can you try to build 21.4.15 with gcc-3.3.3?
I would be surprised if that worked.
- Vin Shelton
Release Mgr for Stable XEmacs Branch