Re:

At 02:32 PM 3/15/00 -0800, Kyle Jones wrote: >Grimly I point out that if we ignored recording changes until >redisplay was called and then compared old state to new state it >would make little difference what lazy-lock did. Existing code >is written expecting the redisplay to work this way. You have a >long battle ahead if you're going to fix all the code that makes >this assumption. No, this is aleady fixed. You don't see flashing because buffer recording doesn't immediately cause redisplay. That's why I didn't fix lazy-lock - because it now works. The crash is unrelated to redisplay IMHO.