Re: automating adding bugs and such to web site
>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic
<hniksic(a)arsdigita.com> writes:
Hrvoje> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
> Jareth is looking into moving to Bugzilla.
Hrvoje> Oh yes! Bugzilla is not perfect, but it appears to be usable. Many
Hrvoje> major projects, most notably Gnome, have moved to Bugzilla and seem to
Hrvoje> be satisfied with it.
> Jitterbug is extremely lynx-unfriendly, simply doesn't
display at
> all with w3. Maybe it would be better if I had a real graphical
> browser, but that's against my religion. ;-)
Hrvoje> Try `links'. It's a textual browser written from scratch by a
Czech
Hrvoje> guy. It supports complex table and can therefore meaningfully render
Hrvoje> most modern web pages. It's unbelievable just how well it works until
Hrvoje> you see it. That piece of software actually restored my faith in
Hrvoje> textual browsers.
Hrvoje> For additional bonus, it is mostly keystroke-compatible with Lynx. I
Hrvoje> keep forgetting the download URL, but you can find it very easily by
Hrvoje> typing `links' into the freshmeat search box.
There is also w3m
o w3m-0.1.10 - http://ei5nazha.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp/~aito/w3m/eng/ -
ftp://ftp.firedrake.org/w3m/
which also renders very well.
w3m can render table.
w3m can render frame. (it converts the frames into a table)
w3m can display documents given from standard input easily.
w3m is small. Binary size of w3m on Sparc workstation is under 300KByte.
Ciao
Volker