Well this fixes the cygwin process output problem, but I have a sneaking
suspicion that this might be a bad thing to do in some circumstances.
Can someone confirm or deny this? All I've done is used the coding type to
dynamically determine the output.
andy
1998-04-29 Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk>
* code-process.el: dynamically decide process coding type under
cygwin.
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs-20/lisp/code-process.el,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -c -r1.3 code-process.el
*** code-process.el 1998/04/11 05:36:53 1.3
--- code-process.el 1998/04/30 02:07:59
***************
*** 77,82 ****
--- 77,84 ----
(setq ret (funcall ret 'call-process program))
)
(cond ((consp ret) (car ret))
+ ((and (not ret) (eq system-type 'cygwin32))
+ 'undecided)
((find-coding-system ret) ret)
)
))))