2007/3/7, Phil Sung <psung(a)mit.edu> wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thanks for writing. This sounds very cool!
Under what license would the XEmacs documentation ultimately be
offered? (GPL, I assume?) I'd be happy to dual-license the slides with
the GFDL and the GPL. Please let me know if that's acceptable for
XEmacs purposes, or if there's another license or whatnot.
See
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3cc241693f0702201736r24a9...
for my conversation with Stephen about it. (I think it's the first 4
messages in thread.) I personally think it'd be less confusing for
people, and more adaptable, if you just released it into the public
domain.:-)
Also let me know if there's anything I do to help adapt this
material
for documentation purposes. I confess, I haven't used XEmacs recently.
Dunno. Xemacs-beta subscribers: if it's not an off-topic question:
what do you think?
(Unfortunately, there was no video or audio of my lecture. Sorry!)
Awww... Who knows, maybe next year you could though? :-)
Cheers,
--Jason
Jabber: jasonspiro at
gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta