on 06/26/2008 05:37 PM Stephen J. Turnbull said the following:
 Vladimir G. Ivanovic writes:
 
  > XEmacs without anti-aliased fonts looks horrendously ugly, IMHO, and I 
  > can't think of an application that doesn't use anti-aliased fonts.
 
 GNU Emacs is one.   
You're right, and it is horrendously ugly. I never use GNU Emacs.
If you want to know why people are reluctant to
 default to Xft, skim the last couple of months of emacs-devel.
 XEmacs's implementation of anti-aliased fonts is probably in no better
 shape.
 
  > I use Xft all the time, and have done so with both 21.4 and 21.5, but 
  > I use non-standard configure options:
  > 
  >     $ ./configure \
  >        --with-xft=emacs,menubars,tabs,gauges \
  >        --with-gnome \
  >        --with-mule=no \
  >        --with-package-path=/usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages
  > 
  > Note (unless these have been fixed): "--with-xft=yes"
 
 This hasn't been fixed, it's on my list, but every time I feel up to
 working on configure, autocrap releases again, and I'm *forced* to
 work on it, after which I have no appetite for working on it. 
CMake? SCons?
  > "--with-gtk" doesn't do anything
 
 It is implied by --with-gnome.  Specifying --with-gnome enforces
 --with-gtk.
 
  > A caveat: Although I get anti-aliased fonts with the above, I don't 
  > always get the fonts I specify. Bold fonts, in particular, are 
  > problematic, and show up larger than they should.
 
 Patches welcome. 
Yes, yes. I know. If only... you know the rest.
--- Vladimir
-- 
Vladimir G. Ivanovic
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta