Re: Dump dumped-lisp?
>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
sb> This patch isn't going to work quite right. The DOC strings for all
sb> loaded files will be lost. I thought the best solution was what was
sb> originally done for EFS with efs-auto.el.
Could you clarify this? I'm afraid my understanding of how doc
strings work is rather incomplete. I'm more than willing to do the
necessary hackery.
> Did I mention that read-time macros (this is the oh-so-fabulous
Erik
> Naggum's idea, no?) are just about the dumbest dumb-ass idea I've ever
> seen in Elisp design additions? Well, they are.
sb> Sigh. They're a cool idea from a maintainer's standpoint.
One problem is that it makes for generating different .elc's from the
same .el depending on where you're compiling. Not so cool ...
--
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla