Stephen,
I would appreciate it if you would update to the most recent version
(if you don't have a Mercurial workspace yet, install Mercurial, then
Done! And it comes up, even though I had to set
EMACSLATEPACKAGES=/usr/local/lib/xemacs
so that it would pick up my package path.
I also had to change configure to use -pthread instead -mthreads:
*** configure.orig 2008-01-31 10:42:27.000000000 +0100
--- configure 2008-01-31 12:23:12.000000000 +0100
***************
*** 19587,19594 ****
if test "$unexec" = "unexaix.o" -a "$x11_release" =
"6"; then
if test "$GCC" = "yes"; then
! X_CFLAGS="-mthreads $X_CFLAGS" && if test "$verbose"
= "yes";
then echo " Prepending \"-mthreads\" to \$X_CFLAGS"; fi
! libs_x="-mthreads $libs_x" && if test "$verbose" =
"yes"; then
echo " Prepending \"-mthreads\" to \$libs_x"; fi
else
case "$CC" in
"xlc" ) CC="xlc_r" ;;
--- 19587,19594 ----
if test "$unexec" = "unexaix.o" -a "$x11_release" =
"6"; then
if test "$GCC" = "yes"; then
! X_CFLAGS="-pthread $X_CFLAGS" && if test "$verbose" =
"yes";
then echo " Prepending \"-pthread\" to \$X_CFLAGS"; fi
! libs_x="-pthread $libs_x" && if test "$verbose" =
"yes"; then
echo " Prepending \"-pthread\" to \$libs_x"; fi
else
case "$CC" in
"xlc" ) CC="xlc_r" ;;
Stephen J. Turnbull schrieb:
> Thomas Mittelstaedt writes:
>
> > This happens sometimes, especially with (generated) Makefiles. When I
> > try undo, xemacs tells me that there is no undo information.
> > When I reload the buffer, I can't see any visible changes.
> > What could that be?
>
> There was a bug that setting the buffer's coding system set the
> modified flag, resulting in similar behavior. This would be very
> noticable after reverting a buffer. Why this would happen for
> generated Makefiles, I'm not sure. Do you revert them often? The bug
> I'm referring to was fixed after the release of 21.5.28.
>
I would appreciate it if you would update to the most recent version
(if you don't have a Mercurial workspace yet, install Mercurial, then
>
> hg clone
http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs
>
> should do the trick). From your description it might be a different
> bug, though probably related.
>
> Also, even for something as simple as this it helps to use M-x
> report-xemacs-bug, since that will tell us whether the bug should be
> fixed in the version you are using. Don't worry about our bandwidth,
> and we appreciate you taking the extra effort if it means cutting and
> pasting into T-bird or something like that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta