Simon Josefsson writes:
On 30 Apr 2002, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
And here he seems to be OK with linking GPL code to GPL code. I suspect
there was misunderstandings and/or typos involved here.
I agree completely that noone shouldn't spend time getting Qt to work
under Windows. The license issues is problem enough, but there doesn't
seem to be any technical merits either. I mean, doesn't Windows users
like the Windows behaviour better than Qt?
> N.B. None of the above is a promise, just a suggestion for how you
> can get started and eventually merge to trunk if things go well.
Unless it turns out to be easy, I'm not doing it all. My main interest is
the KDE KPart stuff, so if it is possible to do that without the Qt widget
stuff (which I actually suspect), that's where I'll put my energy.
So do I. I'm interested in supporting Kde and KParts in particular,
not Qt. So there is no problem at all with GPL.
+-----------------
| Francisco Vides Fernández <pax(a)dedalo-ing.com>
| Director técnico.
| Teléfono fijo: 952 60 29 59
| Teléfono móvil: 661 67 32 73
| Dédalo Ingenieros
http://www.dedalo-ing.com/
+------