Re: ?????
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
> It doesn't contain the simplest reference to the message that
> produced the error. Not even a reminder of the subject line or
> something.
OK, now we at least have something to work with.
Note that this remark was in my first message already.
When one is posting to a patches-only no-discussion mailing list,
why
should it be so strange that the robot moderator rejects the message?
I never said it was strange.
In the first incarnation, the robot would reject the message with
_no_
feedback. This is much better, so we *do* give a damn what he says
apart from diff -u.
Much better, I wouldn't go that far ...
> There could be a more friendly message instead, like "This
list is
> for patches only. If your message contains a bug report or general
> comments on xemacs, please try xemacs-beta", but not just "You
> lost. Try again."
I'll ask Kyle to implement this.
It's been a while since she posted something here. Did she leave the list ?
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / E.N.S.T. INF C214 mailto:vernaļ¼ inf.enst.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. (33) 01 45 81 80 72
75634 Paris cedex 13 Fax. (33) 01 45 81 31 19