Re: pcl-cvs/xemacs bug

nix> I think we need two #defines; PROCESS_LIVE_P() as defined in nix> 21.4.7, and PROCESS_INPUTTABLE_P (crap name though). nix> I'll roll a patch that does that. OK, I'll revert this, pending your patch. Please let me know if you're not going to get to it, I'll release 21.4.8 immediately (well, make that Thursday morning Japan time). I like Adrian's PROCESS_READABLE_P suggestion. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py