Re: reftex needs to be upgraded.
>>>> Stephen wrote:
Stephen> Mats Lidell writes:
> So this is the task. Find all files not compatible with GPLv3 and
fix
> them.
Stephen> Well, that's not as easy to do as to say;
I know...
Stephen> if they are not GPLv3- compatible we need permission of the
Stephen> author to fix them.
Yes.
> As part of this task we should IMHO, in order to be able to
> complete it, only upgrade packages that isn't upwardly compatible
> to GPLv3.
Stephen> I'm not sure what you're saying here.
Well, maybe it is to obvious, but I think we should not at the moment
bother upgrading or syncing packages that already is GPLv3
compatible. We should focus on the packages that isn't in order to
bring the SUMO into shape for a GPLv3 release.
So the plan could be like this:
1. Go through the list of files that needs to be investigated
manually in order to classify them.
2. Based on this classification also classify each package.
3. For packages that isn't GPLv3 compatible se what can be
done. Possibly contacting the copyright holder.
4. Do what ever is needed for each package based on the analysis.
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta