Re: hash tables: print, read, print-readably
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mike Kupfer writes:
> > Really, the size of a hash table is
none-of-your-business-thank-you-
> > very-much. ;-)
[...]
> And if it's not my business, then XEmacs probably
shouldn't expose it in
> the default printed representation.
In the *default* printed representation, it's no problem. That
representation is un(read)able. ;-)
It may not be a problem for someone who's familiar with the
idiosyncrasies of XEmacs Lisp, but this was my first exposure to Lisp
hash tables, and I found it confusing.
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta