Martin Buchholz writes:
Although this is a bug in XEmacs, I suggest that this case is
sufficiently rare and difficult to fix that we not try to fix it.
Wait a moment, was this message posted by an impostor? I have a hard
time believing that the words above were written by the same Martin
who spends countless hours making numerous tiny changes so that he can
compile XEmacs with a C++ compiler, or to gain nanosecond speedups, or
pedantic spelling fixes [1] - then when there's an actual, real-live
bug he suggests not fixing it?
[1] Don't get me wrong, proper spelling is important. But proper code is
even more important.