Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
> -Are there any MULE differences (IANAM - I am not a
Mule(-User)).
> - ...
I would say MULE support on tty.
Forget that one. Mule sucks on TTY, *maybe* unless you're using a
kterm. Read xemacs-mule for more details (or look it up in the recent
archives).
> the gnuclient-problem on the shell.)
If you mean the "don't use gnuclient and xemacs -nw on the same tty"
problem then that is certainly _not_ easily solvable. However it is
also fairly obscure.
And the problem is not new either.
I think the LDAP support is also nice (although currently probably
underused). For me the windows port is the most exiting thing.
Yes. Once again, kudos go to the Windows portrers, especially
Jonathan Harris, Andy Piper, and Kirill Katsnelson.