Re: Binary distributions [ was Re: [PROPOSAL] fix for bad Xrefs ... ]
Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> writes:
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 09:25:58AM -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote:
> (unless someone has access to the full version of InstallShield5)
I have. Now, afaik, distributing such a binary is illegal[1].
[...]
[1] Commercial/non commercial use is not relevant here. GPL is.
Why would that be illegal, if the CD contains the XEmacs sources? Or,
do you mean that the CD should contain the sources to InstallShield --
which would be ridiculous, because it's impossible to achieve!
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Do not meddle in the affairs of troff, for it is subtle and quick
to anger.