Re: Why using (push-mark) ?
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
Huh?? You mean M-< and M->? C-< and C-> are commands
explicitly used
for changing the mark, and they work well.
Yes, sorry. That's what I meant.
> I'd like this behavior to go away unless there's a very
good reason
> (that I missed) to have it.
Well... {beginning,end}-of-buffer could check if the region was
already active, and not push the mark in that case, but I'd like to
make damn sure that we don't break anything by that change. M-< and
M-> have pushed the mark for ages.
Yup. I could provide a patch and let people try it for some
time. Also, if somebody sees something that could get broken, let he speak.
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / E.N.S.T. INF C201.1 mailto:vernaļ¼ inf.enst.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. (33) 01 45 81 73 46
75634 Paris cedex 13 Fax. (33) 01 45 81 31 19