Re: auto-autoloads errors
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Michael Sperber writes:
> It's a general recommendation for any package: "site-packages" really
is
> for packages that aren't part of the regular XEmacs packages distro.
Yeah, but I don't understand why we try to load the same package
autoloads twice. People do this all the time (in particular, people
who have a distro-based SUMO installation and want to have an
up-to-date version of a particular package), and we really should
support that and not whine about it.
Exactly.
A different question: I wonder if it would be possible (ie, with a
reasonable amount of coding effort) and worthwhile to report
whole-package shadows instead of zillions of library shadows for each
shadowed package?
Or what about a specific warning class for the duplicate autoload
messages? We could then just put that in display-warning-supressed-classes.
--
Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.
Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta