Re: Custom vs. specifier terminology in lisp/faces.el
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
OK, I'll look at this. Missing tags shouldn't be a problem,
Custom
can define its own. Possibly there's something missing in the
semantics of specifiers, or maybe Hrvoje just didn't like the apparent
bloat.
I think one of the problems is that the current specifier
implementation is slow.
Jan