Re: [RFC] whitespace.el
Didier Verna writes:
I'm currently wondering why [whitespace.el] is in text-modes.
Wouldn't it
be better placed in edit-utils ?
Possibly. We have a couple other library moves pending (the json.el
and xml.el stuff in net-utils, for example). I think if we're going
to do it, we may as well try to do as many as possible at once. Any
takers to write up a RFC on reorganizing the stdlib?
Norbert, what do you think? You're most affected by any messing with
package organization.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta