Re: interactive code letter ^
Didier Verna writes:
In the same vein, I discovered recently that GNU Emacs has two bits
of
regexp syntax that we currently don't: \_> and \_<, meaning empty string
at the the end/beginning of /symbols/.
Ugly, although it's probably not that hard to implement. But aren't
POSIX classes more important?
And isn't it time we admitted that Jamie was right, and just not get
invovled with problem #2 (unless it's actually a solution)?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta