Hi Alan,
>>>> Alan Mackenzie <acm(a)muc.de> writes:
Presumably after each little change to my (package-)source code,
I'll need to do a 'make install' to test it. Or would it be better
to put the source code directly under the install directory?
No. Just do "make install" and let make put the packages where you
have chosen in your Local.rules file.
XEMACS_INSTALLED_PACKAGES_ROOT=...
(This should be in harmony with the --with-package-path that you used
for building your XEmacs binary.)
My setup (and the recommend way to do it according to Local.rules)
Building xemacs binary:
--prefix=/src/xemacs
--with-package-path=~/.xemacs:/src/xemacs/xemacs-packages:/src/xemacs/mule-packages:/src/xemacs/site-packages
Building xemacs packages
sources located at: /src/xemacs/packages
In Local.rules: XEMACS_INSTALLED_PACKAGES_ROOT = ${XEMACS_PACKAGES_BASE}/..
There is a description in the Local.rules file that describes this
above in detail.
I use this approach so the installation is it's own copy and not
depending on what I might pull into the sources. This way your
packages will not be destroyed by some package that won't
compile. (Which might happen if you symlink to the sources.)
This is a real time sink, for both of us. Thanks for the help.
Nah. Glad to help and it is fun to compile the packages ;-) It takes
some time though. That is the reason for the existence of the prebuilt
packages and the sumu!
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta