On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 at 20:09:38 +0000, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es>
wrote:
On 14 Oct 2003, stephen(a)xemacs.org wrote:
> No, it has nothing to do with instability of the application.
> Excessive iconization has, however, been known to drive Emacs
> developers into a certain degree of mental instability.
This of course is the last thing we want.
For some of us, it's too late.
Seriously, though, I suspect that my experience as an educator is
probably typical. I teach the intro to computer programming class about
once every other year. We used to use Metrowerks CodeWarrior in that
class. We found, though, that it induced the "click and drool"
mentality among our students. All they knew was that this nice shiny
IDE had neat looking buttons that, when pushed, caused Magic Stuff to
happen. They had no clue what the thing was really doing. If they
encountered an out of the ordinary situation, they couldn't cope.
We switched to teaching the intro class with Linux and command line
tools. Those students can be shown an IDE and be up and running on it
very quickly, because they understand the underlying principles. The
earlier students would be lost in a command line setting.
Icons can be great shortcuts when you understand what they're doing. If
they are magic buttons, though, the user has no hope of understanding
what is going on when something goes wrong. This may induce a certain
amount of anti-icon sentiment among some developers.
--
Jerry James, who knows that there are 10 kinds of people in the world
http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~james/