>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Just from the name, I think xemacs-devel is probably more
appropriate. [...]
I just thought that we would like to add a test target to the
packages. So it would be convenient to be able to do a "make test" in
each package that depends on it. So each package, that use ert at
least, would have to depend on the package were ert is situated. This
way the package smoketest could include a unit test for each package
that supports it.
Since all packages already depend on xemacs-base that would be a good
place for it I thought. But maybe it is as good or better to have the
test target to introduce a dependency on xemacs-devel implicitly!?
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta