UTF-2000 in in CVS tree? [was: CVS just trashed...]

mb> UTF-2000 could be put on a CVS branch. This would involve mb> learning a fair bit about CVS, but then the boring part of the mb> tough merging job could be done by cvs, not you. Hm? Last I heard, CVS didn't know how to fix # of arg mismatches, nor how to deal with radical Olivier Galibert structure member transplants. :-) Nor do I "own" UTF-2000, that's Tomo's. I don't think he's interested; but we could ask him again. There's also the ETL licensing issue; Tomo claimed it's irrelevant, but I am not sure, at least not without explicit statement from him. If something comes of this (ie, a proposal for sensible architecture), I'll discuss it with you again, but at the moment I don't want to manage a branch that may simply die because the architecture becomes obsolete. If somebody else is interested enough in UTF-2000 to manage the branch themselves, I'd be happy to follow along. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."