Re: Anybody using pcl-cvs 1.46 with any success?
>>>> "Charles" == Charles G Waldman
<cgw(a)fnal.gov> writes:
Charles> Adrian Aichner writes:
>
> I coming to the conclusion more and more that the new port of
> ftp://rum.cs.yale.edu/pub/monnier/pcl-cvs/pcl-cvs-2.9.9.tar.gz
> isn't really working in XEmacs, if at all.
Charles> There are definitely problems with it - see e.g. my
Charles> posting
Charles> http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-beta/200005/msg00416.html
Charles> concerning the reference to the missing function
Charles> `vc-resolve-conflicts'
Ah, yes, I saw that.
Charles> but, despite this I am using it on a daily basis without
Charles> *too* much grief.
Hmmh ...
Can you commit from the *cvs* buffer useing
c runs the command cvs-mode-commit
?
> Has anybody commited a file with this
> pcl-cvs-version "v2_9_9"
Charles> Yes.
>
> Today I found that commiting files does not work.
>
> the argument to -m does not get quoted at all. How is this supposed
> to work at all?
Charles> I haven't seen this behavior here! I've been merrily
Charles> committing files and the CVS logs look normal... hmmm
Using
c runs the command cvs-mode-commit
with multi-word commit messages with whitespace between the words?
I am baffled.
Adrian
Charles> I have "v2_9_9" of pcl-cvs - I wonder what the difference
Charles> is? I built mine from source from the xemacs-packages
Charles> CVS tree, did you build from source or download the
Charles> binary package?
I installed the binary package 1.46.
The latest CVS sources don't show any quoting of the commit message
either.
Best regards,
Adrian