Re: [Q] Re: [xemacs-base] Add byte-compiler warning control library

Steve Youngs writes: The more I think about it, the more I think `package-suppress' itself is a step backward. I'm having a very hard time seeing a genuine use-case, and lots of theoretical ways for any definition to go wrong. Is there really any excuse for either regexp-opt or easy-mmode to be in core? It seems to me that this was just Ben being lazy. Do you have other use-cases for package-suppress? _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta