Re: new tq.el breaks clearcase.el?
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Michael Diers <mdiers(a)elego.de> writes:
>> (set-process-filter process
>> - (`(lambda (proc string)
>> - (tq-filter '(, tq) string))))
>> + `(lambda (proc string)
>> + (tq-filter '(, tq) string)))
>> tq))
>>
>> ;;; accessors
>
> The change above looks like a bad synch to me. The FSF 21.3 version
> does not seem to have this change to tq-create.
[...]
> I've only started running the current SUMO today. First test results
> suggest that backing out the change to tq-create should fix the
> problem.
As far as I can tell, it only changes from old-style backquotes to
the proper backquote syntax.
Well, but it is a half-finished change since the comma operator is
still used in the manner for the old backquote syntax.
You'd have to write ',tq instead of '(, tq), too.
I don't think that editorial changes like that make much sense when
synching: they'll only complicate matters at the time of the next
synch even when done correctly.
I apologize for barging in like this, since I was only looking at the
group to see whether some bugs had already been dealt with.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum