Re: Qt Xemacs ??
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 06 May 2002 03:47, David Faure wrote:
On Friday 03 May 2002 01:51, Rodolfo Conde Martinez wrote:
> But as you said, XParts is still not fully operational and i would like
> more a KPart xemacs that a xpart....
Read a bit about XPart.
And XPart components "looks" like a KParts component to the hosting
application, that's the whole point of it - no change required in the
application, if it already supports embedding KParts components.
i see, thats ok but i think having a native qt xemacs would be the best, in
that way xemacs can take full advantage of all the Qt stuff, antialising, Xft
extensions, themes, etc. and i guess having a native Qt xemacs, from there it
would be easy to do a Kpart for kde.....of course i didnt mean XParts was
bad, i just would prefer a native xemacs Qt (i dont have TTF fonts inside
xemacs, i had to install the xfstt server to have'em :(, but lately that
doesnt work, so im stuck with ugly fonts.....) and im really dying to see
xemacs inside KDevelop :):)....
Cheers...
- --
rcm.
rcm(a)gmx.co.uk
GPG Public Key: http://ada.fciencias.unam.mx/~rconde/rodolfo_gpg.txt
ICQ 118193727
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE81xd2x2Sktruwba0RAuz0AKDO39hoHxnlME6F2zyXNEjxX/f9yACeK2Gq
mz4CnWEc9nRvZ0Ch8kqppBQ=
=DZbP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----