Re: Problem with package-get
Yoshiki Hayashi <yoshiki(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> ;; What ever happened to i-f-c-literally
Note that when I wrote this line I honestly thought i-f-c-literally
has gone.
If I understand things correctly, i-f-c-literally sets
file-name-handler-alist to nil and thus disables efs.
Which is not a problem as the file is already local here.
There's a patch from Jan to fix this problem, but it
involves efs change and it won't be in until Michael reviews
it.
:-(
Hmmm. Now I'm confused. The above code binds
file-name-handlers-list to nil, so it disables efs. Then,
what's the point of not using i-f-c-l?
And one more. i-f-c-l uses raw-text to read file.
Shouldn't it use binary coding-system?
I think we should make both these changes.
Jan