Re: RFC: -- default configure to --with-mule

Sean MacLennan writes: > On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:23:50 +0900 > "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; wrote: > > > Anybody with feelings about this, please let us know! > > If with-mule becomes the default, will the xemacs-mule-sumo be > rolled into the xemacs-sumo? It seems to me that if with-mule is > the default, the "default" sumo should just work. I'll have to think about it. For the packages the main issue is that it's just deadweight, I think, although there *may* be some packages that conditionally require Mule packages if they're available (rather than when (featurep 'mule)). That would be *bad* as Alan discovered. > Not sure how that would affect us without-mule users. Shouldn't affect you at all. You'll just have some deadweight files under mule-packages.