Re: hg diff --subrepos
Did we come up with a final set of steps for package maintainers? I'm
still confused.
In particular, does the package maintainer do the commit/push in the
top-level repo? (I saw emails suggesting yes and no.)
And I assume that Norbert is still the person who updates the package
version number, right?
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I think that it should also be possible to use named branches. The
big problem with named branches is that they have a habit of coercing
"tip" to themselves, and you end up with everybody that pulls from
that repo on a branch that's not related to them.
Personally, I'd like to stay away from named branches. They're not
Mercurial's design center, and they seem to be a frequent source of
questions on the Mercurial users mailing list.
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta