Re: Alias analysis: consoles

Jerry James writes: I think it is definitely preferable to use the default optimizations of the compiler where possible (except that I'm of the school that says "I'll see your '-O6' and raise you 10" when I'm holding "-Os" :-). GCC has always been more reliable when you let it do what it wants to do. The macros though were Ben and Martin's creations. Last I talked to Martin, it seemed very unlikely that he would return to active duty on 21.5. He had his private ambitions to rewrite in C++, and he favored 21.4 anyway. I don't know what Ben's intentions are, but I know he's alive and has unmerged workspaces, so maybe we should ask him. I personally have no objection to removing what you consider unnecessary macros though, as long is something is done to maintain error-checking. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta