Re: Fix compile issues for C89 compilers.
François Revol writes:
>>>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>
> Stephen> GCC has a -C89 switch or something like that that either
> Stephen> enforces or warns about C89 compatibility. Perhaps beta
> Stephen> builds should use that switch?
>
> Which C89 compiler do we support?
Btw...
The BeOS port requires gcc 2.95 due to the C++ API...
Er, that's not "supported" yet. :-)
Are you at a point where (a) it's more or less usable for non-hackers
(probably there are few such on BeOS, but even hackers don't want to
spend all their time repairing their editor!) and (b) is properly
compartmentalized with configure magic and #ifdefs?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta