Re: Update to last message
Sorry been meaning to email about this. The problem went away. Don't
know why, but I compiled again a couple weeks later and it was just
gone. Maybe machine flakiness. Maybe compiler flakiness. I don't
really know.
Thanks for all your help
Jim
>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2001 11:07:51 -0700, Andy Piper
<andyp(a)bea.com> said:
Andy> Do you set a bunch of stuff in Xdefaults? Does this show up
Andy> even with vanilla? andy
Andy> At 01:54 PM 5/8/01 -0400, James LewisMoss wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2001 10:04:21 -0700, Andy
Piper
> >>>>> <andyp(a)bea.com> said:
>
Andy> At 12:54 PM 5/8/01 -0400, James LewisMoss wrote:
> >> >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2001 08:56:19 -0700,
Andy Piper
> >> >>>>> <andyp(a)bea.com> said:
> >>
Andy> So I can't reproduce this on RH 7.0, so maybe there is
Andy> something extra in your environment. I started XEmacs -vanilla
Andy> and then brought up the file and switched on font-lock. Is
Andy> there anything else I should do?
> >>
> >> Not sure. Maybe something else in the elisp stuff makes a
> >> difference (from two or three messages ago I'll resend if you
> >> like). Could it be a dark/light/auto background mode thing?
> >> Maybe the combination of faces I have? Maybe something broken
> >> on Debian.
>
Andy> So can you reproduce it using vanilla? If not try building up
Andy> your .emacs until it breaks.
>
> I couldn't. Adding just that code to -vanilla I could reproduce.
>
> Jim
>
> -- ＠James LewisMoss <dres(a)debian.org> | Blessed Be! ＠
> http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl! ＠"Argue for
> your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
--
＠James LewisMoss <dres(a)debian.org> | Blessed Be!
＠ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
＠"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach