Ailin Nemui writes:
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 21:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> for (len = 0; (mbuf[len]) && (len < 512); len++);
> for (; (mbuf[len] != '(') && (len > 0); len--);
Thanks Steve for your detailed analysis. I have come to the suspicion
that this is something SuSE broke-patched themselves and am verifying
with a pristine build. I hope this is it and then am truly sorry for
wasting your time on this issue.
It's not a waste of time. :-)
SuSE's been help to us in the past, and I know the code pretty well.
I'm pretty sure there are patches to that file (the line is off by 2),
but I don't see why they'd be messing with that particular stretch of
code, and we have other people with gcc 4.8.1 issues.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta