Re: reftex needs to be upgraded.
Rodney Sparapani writes:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> If it is v3, we may still be OK, but the problem is that
packages are
> useless without XEmacs (I wouldn't claim that we're distributing them
> so that GNU Emacs can use them), and Richard Stallman has made claims
> that I understand to mean that makes them "part" of XEmacs.
Wait a minute. That's exactly what I do.
I know people *do* use XEmacs packages with GNU. Nonetheless the
extra stuff (package-info etc) is designed to work with XEmacs, and
GNU Emacs provides no support for that.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta