Re: Common Lisp vs. Scheme
sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes:
Many thanks to everyone who have participated in the discussion so
far.
I've done a pass over my web pages at
http://www-pu.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/users/sperber/xemacs/next-gener...
I've removed a lot of the noise (hopefully), and added stuff on
Common Lisp from the recent posts on xemacs-beta. My aim is, at
this point in time, to include information which is as factual as
possible.
Looks good to me. As far as the web page is concerned, the case for
Common Lisp is now as convincing as the case for Scheme.
I'd appreciate if people like Stephen, Hrvoje and Reggie could
look
it over and tell me what I've missed and what they disagree with.
Surely I fucked up on a few points.
Please remove the "Common Lisp has builtin WHEN." I don't think Lars
meant that seriously...
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Try to use "ad nauseam" at least once per flame. It doesn't mean
anything; but it gives that polished feel to your postings.