Re: about the packages: directory names and places

SJT> (a) as Michael pointed out, many, probably the majority, of SJT> existing hosts don't have .../share/; enforcing it will confuse SJT> their users and admins, and could be annoying if the local SJT> XEmacs maintainer doesn't have rights to the .../ directory This isn't really a problem, is it ? The key idea would be to check for the /share-directory (and of course to check whether one is allowed to write on it) and to use /lib otherwise as the default. I certainly like the idea (mostly running Linux), although I also like a package of the size of XEmacs not to spread its various files all over /. Holger -- --- http://www.coling.uni-freiburg.de/~schauer/ --- "Keine Shell, kein Prompt, keine Kekse." -- Jochen Hein in de.comp.os.linux.misc