On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 06:52:12PM -0700, Kyle Jones wrote:
True, but let's not go overboard. I don't see anything in
the
GPL that precludes us from coding for non-free libraries as long
as we don't ship binaries containing those libraries. We can
presumably ship stuff that dynamically links and we can ship
source distributions with no binaries.
That was also the general interpretation in the Kimp[1] fiasco (source
is legal, binaries are illegal).
OG.
[1] (Badly done) port of gimp to Qt (KDE), done without the authors
consent.