Re: cygwin xemacs problems

Mats Lidell writes: And my apologies to you, Mats, if you took the meaning that you were being offensive. Your reply was helpful in both fact and in your intention, but I know from my own experience working with Ben that it's hard to understand the full implications of these handicaps without experiencing them. That's all I wanted to imply. Well, from what you say, it sounds like your part is done. I have a budget to present on Saturday, after that I should have considerable free time to look at XEmacs, in particular run one more pair of eyes over your work. If things go well in the preliminary committee meeting tomorrow, maybe Friday and Saturday. But based on past experience and rumored last minute budget requests, I won't bet on it.:-( _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta