Re: Qt Xemacs ??
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 08:37, Rendhalver [Peter Brown] wrote:
>>>>> "Rodolfo" == Rodolfo Conde Martinez
<rcm(a)gmx.co.uk> writes:
Rodolfo> On Tuesday 30 April 2002 07:29, pax! wrote:
Rodolfo> Ok, so it seems to be more interests in the KParts that a qt
widget, im Rodolfo> interested in this too, so if everything is ok with the
license now it would Rodolfo> be good to do a KPart XEmacs and yes maybe do
something like Stephen said, Rodolfo> all of us interested in it could
start planning by private email....gee i Rodolfo> didnt really think that
my little mail with subject QT Xemacs would have such Rodolfo>
answer:):).....thanks all.....
i might be a bit naieve when it comes to KDE so if im wrong forgive me
i was under the impression that you do need to use qt for KDE apps
or is there some kind of funky abstraction thingy which lets you get
around it some how ??
No the problem here has been the licenses of Qt, qt is not free under
windows, but if we use KDE, yes were inside using qt, BUT Qt GPL'ed, so we
would be linking free software with free software as KDE is GPL'ed and so you
make sure youre using Qt GPL'ed, and thats is ok, and of course its ok with
rms....
Rodolfo> if KDevelop can get xemacs as the core editor it will be
DEFINITY BETTER that Rodolfo> any one of the Visual Studio
apps.....:):):).....
agreed there (even tho i have NEVER used KDevelop)
having a xemacs kde KPART will be awesome !!!! xemacs will integrate fully
inside all of kde, and kde can make the most use of the power of
xemacs.....both will help greatly each other.....
So is anyone interested about doing this ??
Regards...
- --
rcm.
rcm(a)gmx.co.uk
GPG Public Key: http://ada.fciencias.unam.mx/~rconde/rodolfo_gpg.txt
ICQ 118193727
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE80IMVx2Sktruwba0RAufrAJ4r+HQPoe28rTRq3LnrR3x5ukbjKgCgvWI7
jmZ/Cqj3nHCRzfBxGVDeZT0=
=n9Cu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----