Re: hg diff --subrepos
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mike S's proposal is that
(1) package maintainers (ie, those allowed to commit to the package)
commit and push in the package, but not in the top level.
(2) Norbert pulls in the package, then commits and pushes in the
top-level, followed by doing what he's always done.
Seems reasonable to me.
Yes, that sounds fine to me, too.
> Personally, I'd like to stay away from named branches
You won't get any argument from me on that. However, people who are
used to them might be able to use them to communicate branches via the
package repos. It's their package they screw up if they get it wrong.
Okay, that makes sense.
thanks,
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta