Re: Why using (push-mark) ?

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes: > Huh?? You mean M-< and M->? C-< and C-> are commands explicitly used > for changing the mark, and they work well. Yes, sorry. That's what I meant. > > I'd like this behavior to go away unless there's a very good reason > > (that I missed) to have it. > > Well... {beginning,end}-of-buffer could check if the region was > already active, and not push the mark in that case, but I'd like to > make damn sure that we don't break anything by that change. M-< and > M-> have pushed the mark for ages. Yup. I could provide a patch and let people try it for some time. Also, if somebody sees something that could get broken, let he speak.