Re: gnus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greg Klanderman writes:
Could one of you heavy Gnus users advise me on getting better mail
performance? I was thinking of switching from nnfolder to nnmaildir
but was a little concerned about having the splitting performance be
worse based on the comparison page in the info manual's comments
regarding nnml splitting performance and similarities of that backend
to nnmaildir. Which backend do you guys use? And how do I move my
existing mail to a new backend?
Does 200--400 messages a day count as heavy? I use nnml, with
approx. 200 different groups and a 120-line nnmail-split-fancy, and
I've never noticed any performance problems. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht(a)inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNJaNBkjnJixAXWBoRAh0VAJ94Kk8dKbrEJwNuYMWkZVplM569kQCdFV1K
Ac5AwxiF08pMACOrBQVYhP0=
=Yqpy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta