Re: Files with same name in packages. Problem?
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 15:10, Simon Josefsson wrote:
IMHO all but the ecrypto one should be removed and other packages
should depend on ecrypto for md5.el. Ecrypty doesn't depend on any
other packages, so requiring it is pretty lightweight. If there is
any problems with the ecrypto md5*.el, let's fix it.
Sounds good to me. Simon, ISTR you said something about working with
other packages so that they would use md5 from ecrypto, have you taken
(or are you planning to take) a look at the Gnus case? I think you've
already removed the other duplicates...
--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at xemacs.org